Local source boundary
Pilot records stay in the agreed customer-controlled scope.
Keep private work inside the configured boundary.
adapterOS mounts approved records into a controlled workspace. Local or customer-controlled deployment can keep source work separate from the public website lane.
A workspace boundary configured around the work.
The security story is not a vendor inventory. It is a configured boundary: what records are mounted, what work can touch them, and which approved outputs may follow the egress rules.
Reviewable records
Review records show support and limits without publishing the source corpus.
Separate website lane
Public forms handle inquiries. Sensitive work is scoped separately.
Local workspacecustomer-controlled boundary
Private records
Mounted work
Review packet
Approved outputs follow configured egress rules.
Public website
Inquiry forms and site traffic are separate from customer source work.
Workspace boundary
Only approved records are mounted for the run. Source support stays tied to that boundary.
Separate serving path
adapteros.com handles inquiry traffic. Sensitive customer work is scoped to the agreed local or on-prem lane.
Reviewable packets
Answers leave with source receipts, visible gaps, reviewer state, and reuse history attached.
Designed around sensitive record work
The useful pilot is a bounded source problem: records a reviewer cares about, questions that repeat, and answers that need to be defended.
Codebases
Repository context, changes, incidents, and release evidence.
Legal records
Policies, case files, citations, contracts, and review notes.
Financial records
Statements, controls, reconciliations, and audit packets.
Customer records
Account files, support trails, operational histories, and decisions.
Clinical records
Scoped materials where exact source support matters before use.
These are source-boundary categories, not certifications or legal guarantees. The pilot narrows the records, handling rules, reviewer duties, and success criteria before use.
What the boundary review proves
Every pilot starts by making the boundary inspectable before sensitive work begins.
Mounted source set
The approved records for the workflow are named and bounded.
Local run path
Sensitive runs are scoped to the agreed customer environment.
Review packet
Answers carry source support, limits, and reuse history.
Escalation rules
Incomplete or degraded context is labeled before a reviewer relies on it.
Reusable context has to stay reviewable.
adapterOS preserves the proof trail so follow-up work can show what source support was reused, what changed, and where a reviewer still has to decide.
Cited answer
The claim points back to the mounted source that supports it.
Reviewer check
The packet shows source, gap, limit, and acceptance state together.
Reuse or limit
Approved context can carry forward. Degraded context stays labeled.
Security contact
Report security issues to security@adapteros.com. We acknowledge reports within 2 business days and provide an initial assessment within 5 business days.
Review the security boundary
The pilot review records the source boundary, handling rules, reviewer duties, and work packet expectations before sensitive work starts.